Process Of Buying A House
Read latest blogs and articles from Housystan

The Information mentioned here was last updated on:
18/2/2025In recent years, India has witnessed rapid urbanization, with an increasing demand for housing and infrastructure. This has brought attention to various construction methodologies, with the Mivan framework system and the conventional method standing out as notable approaches. While both have distinct advantages and challenges, the choice between them often boils down to specific project needs, cost considerations, and time constraints.
The Mivan framework system, originally developed in Malaysia, has gained significant traction in India due to its efficiency and speed. This innovative technology utilizes aluminum formworks to construct large concrete structures swiftly, making it an attractive option for builders in bustling Indian cities like Mumbai, Delhi, and Bengaluru. One of the key benefits of the Mivan system is its rapid construction pace. Unlike traditional methods that require several weeks to complete a floor, the Mivan technology can achieve the same in just a few days. This speed is crucial in megacities, where the demand for housing is relentless and space is at a premium.
Another significant advantage of the Mivan framework system is the superior quality of construction it offers. The precision of the aluminum formworks ensures uniformity and strength, resulting in robust structures that require minimal maintenance. This method is particularly valuable in areas prone to seismic activity, such as Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh, where building resilience is essential. Additionally, the smooth finish of walls and slabs reduces the need for extensive plastering, thereby saving on both material costs and labor.
- Verified Tenants/Buyers
- Unlimited Property Listing
- Zero subscription/charges fee
Despite its many advantages, the Mivan framework system is not without its drawbacks. The initial cost of aluminum formworks can be daunting, especially for smaller developers. However, this investment pays off in the long term through reduced construction time and labor costs. Furthermore, the system requires highly skilled workers for both assembly and dismantling, presenting a challenge in regions where skilled labor is scarce. Training programs and workshops are crucial to overcoming this hurdle and ensuring that this technology can be effectively implemented across India.
In contrast, the conventional method of construction, which relies on brick and mortar, remains deeply entrenched in India's construction landscape. This traditional approach is well-suited to projects with less stringent time constraints and where skilled labor for modern techniques is harder to find. Moreover, it offers a degree of flexibility in design alterations, a factor that is often limited in Mivan-based projects due to the rigid formwork system. Cities like Kolkata and Chennai, with their rich architectural heritage, often prefer conventional techniques to preserve the aesthetic appeal of new constructions amidst historical surroundings.
However, the conventional method comes with its own set of challenges. Construction times are significantly longer, which can lead to delays—an issue that is particularly troublesome in Indian metros where real estate demands are high. Additionally, the labor-intensive nature of this method can inflate costs, and the reliance on multiple skilled trades can complicate project management.
Sustainability is another crucial factor that influences the choice between Mivan and conventional construction methods. The former generally offers a more sustainable option, as it reduces waste and minimizes resource usage. Furthermore, the durability and reduced maintenance needs of Mivan-constructed buildings align well with environmental goals. In contrast, traditional construction often results in higher material wastage and energy consumption, making it less favorable from an environmental perspective.
Ultimately, the decision between employing the Mivan framework system or sticking with the conventional method hinges on several factors, including project scale, budget, location, and specific client needs. While Mivan is ideal for large-scale urban projects and high-rise buildings in fast-paced cities, the conventional method might still be preferable for smaller developments or in areas with less pressure on timelines and more emphasis on style and heritage.
As India's cities continue to grow and evolve, so too will its construction practices. By carefully considering the unique demands of each project and embracing innovative solutions like the Mivan framework system where appropriate, India can better meet its infrastructure needs while ensuring quality, efficiency, and sustainability in construction.
Exploring the real estate market offers exciting opportunities but can also be complex. Whether you're buying a home, making an investment, or keeping up with market trends, having the right insights is key. Stay informed, plan strategically, and make confident decisions to secure the perfect property. Your real estate journey starts here!